Nadia Hussain mocks Charlie Kirk after his Assassination

 

Nadia Hussain, you sanctimonious opportunist, your latest outburst is a masterclass in hypocrisy and bad faith, and it’s about time someone called it out. Using the brutal assassination of Charlie Kirk, gunned down in cold blood on a Utah stage today, September 11, 2025, as a prop to peddle your tired, race-baiting sob story is not just crass, it’s downright despicable. “Why is it that when white men die, the world mourns, and when 20,000 children die, silence fills the streets?” you wail, clutching your pearls for effect. Spare us the crocodile tears. Let’s get one thing straight: Charlie Kirk wasn’t mourned because he was white, he was mourned because he was a human being, a voice for free speech, silenced by a bullet for daring to stand by his convictions. The FBI’s still hunting the coward who did it, with a $100,000 reward on the table, and mourners are already gathering at the Utah State Capitol, hardly the silence you so conveniently invent. Meanwhile, your Gaza reference conveniently ignores the reality: pro-Palestinian marches are clogging Western streets every weekend, 50,000 in London just two weeks ago, per police reports. Silence? Hardly. It’s a deafening roar you’re willfully deaf to. And let’s talk about those 20,000 children in Gaza, tragic, yes, and a figure loosely echoing UNICEF’s grim tally of over 14,000 child casualties by late 2024. But where’s your outrage for the 400,000 dead in Yemen, or the Druze being massacred in Syria right now? Oh, right, those don’t fit your anti-Western narrative. Your selective compassion reeks of agenda, not empathy. You’ve turned a political murder into a soapbox to smear a dead man, painting Kirk as some hate-monger when his record shows a commitment to debate, not division, unlike your venomous deflection. This isn’t bravery, Nadia, it’s cowardice masquerading as virtue. You, sacked by the BBC for no longer fitting their “neat box,” now lash out with anti-white bile, proving exactly why they dropped you. If a progressive darling had been shot, you’d be demanding vigils and hate speech laws. But Kirk? “Well, didn’t he have it coming?” your subtext screams. Disgusting. The real terror here is your willingness to exploit tragedy to stoke division, all while ignoring the violence from your own ideological corner. Charlie Kirk died for speaking his truth, your silence on that violence speaks volumes about yours.